18 Apr 2007 18 Apr '07
Great -- if you target 2.6, it'll automatically be merged into 3.0 the next time somebody runs svnmerge. (Thomas?)
On 4/18/07, Jason Orendorff firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 4/17/07, Guido van Rossum email@example.com wrote:
Perhaps a rewrite could target 3.0 and 2.6 could use a backported version of this *if* py3k compatibility mode is enabled? I'd love to see at least the 3.0 version cleaned up.
A lot of these bugs can be fixed without forking. I've been conservative so far. I looked at a diff this morning. Even pickled documents shouldn't break.
If this patch lands, I can look at further cleanup after that.
Thanks everyone, -j
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)