We’ll, typically you don’t explicitly mention ExceptionGroup — it’s implied by the ‘except*’ syntax. Introducing match semantics probably wouldn’t open up new functionality, you can already write ‘except (E1, E2):’.

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 09:00 Thomas Grainger <tagrain@gmail.com> wrote:
What about `except case ExceptionGroup[E1 | E2]:`? and use match semantics?

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021, 16:50 Irit Katriel via Python-Dev, <python-dev@python.org> wrote:

We wonder if people have a view on which of the following is clearer/better:
1. except *E as e:  //  except *(E1, E2) as e:
2. except* E as e:  //  except* (E1, E2) as e:
(The difference is in the whitespace around the *).

At the moment * is a separate token so both are allowed, but we could change that (e.g., make except* a token), and in any case we need to settle on a convention that we use in documentation, etc.
It is also not too late to opt for a completely different syntax if a better one is suggested. 


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4B256YKUPW5P2M44GG5H6FBL3PSV6ODP/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/XNZNX2M2PQ24VEH5GWCGVFS5EY6XMRAX/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--
--Guido (mobile)