On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:39:03 am Jason R. Coombs wrote:
I'd like to express additional interest in python patch 1660179, discussed here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/patches/2007-February/021687.html
[...]
But to me, a compose function is much easier to read and much more consistent with the decorator usage syntax itself.
def meta_decorator(data): return compose(dec_register_function_for_x, dec_alter_docstring, dec_inject_some_data(data))
Surely that's better written as:
meta_decorator = compose(dec_register_function_for_x, dec_alter_docstring, dec_inject_some_data)
I admit, I may be a bit biased; my first formal programming course was taught in Scheme.
Mine wasn't -- I've never even used Scheme, or Lisp, or any other functional language. But I've come to appreciate Python's functional tools, and would like to give a +0.5 to compose(). +1 if anyone can come up with additional use-cases.