On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdonek@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't disagree that he shouldn't have cross-posted. I was just pointing out that the language should be clarified. What's confusing is that the current language implies that one shouldn't send any PEP-related e-mails to any mailing list other than peps@. In particular, how can one discuss PEPs on python-dev or python-ideas without violating that language (e.g. this e-mail which is related to PEP 1)? It is probably just a matter of clarifying what "PEP-related" means.
I'm just not seeing the confusion, sorry. And we have never really had any confusion over this wording before. If you want to send a patch to tweak the wording to me more clear then please go ahead and I will consider it, but I'm not worried enough about it to try to come up with some rewording myself.
I uploaded a proposed patch to this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue16746 --Chris