>> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 bots
>> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py -
>> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with'
>> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap
>> > Python-ast.h/c
>> >
>> > Two questions:
>> >
>> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch
>> > asdl*
>> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that
>> > changed.
>> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because
>> > Python-ast.*
>> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots or
>> > users?
>>
>> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to
>> run asdl_c.py.
>
>
> How should we go about doing this?

Complain to Antoine I suppose. :)
[+ Antoine]
Done :)

While we're at it, it seems that .hgtouch is wrong:

Include/ast.h: Parser/Python.asdl Parser/asdl.py Parser/asdl_c.py
Python/Python-ast.c: Include/ast.h

The file Include/ast.h is not, in fact, auto-generated. But Include/Python-ast.h *is*, and it does not appear in this file.

Typo? [+Ezio]

Eli