26 Feb
2002
26 Feb
'02
12:20 a.m.
"PP" == Paul Prescod
writes:
PP> This doesn't make internationalization more difficult. As PP> proof I present mailman, which *already* does the PP> interpolation I ask for as a feature of its implementation of PP> "_()". All I'm asking is that mailman's interpolation feature PP> ALSO be available under a simplified syntax at compile time. Except that remember the interpolation step must happen /after/ the translation step, otherwise it's worse than useless. -Barry