Sept. 9, 2021
8:58 a.m.
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:55:04 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S. The fact that it *didn't* look like the inverse operation for `int.from_bytes` was one advantage of calling the method `bytes.fromord` instead of `bytes.fromint`, but I'm still happy the SC is right that `bytes.fromint` is a more comprehensible method name overall.
Perhaps we can call it `bytes.byte` to make it unambiguous? Regards Antoine.