On 9 May 2014 07:23, "Donald Stufft" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On May 8, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Paul Moore <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Or
> > maybe we have to accept that some developers have sound reasons for
> > not hosting on PyPI and work with them to find an acceptable
> > compromise? Has anyone checked what Stefan's reasons are for not
> > hosting cdecimal on PyPI? Do they represent a use case that the PEP
> > hasn't considered?
> If I recall correctly his reasoning is that he finds the legal requirements
> associated with uploading to PyPI to be unsatisfactory.
I actually need to follow up on that, because the terms *were* legally questionable last time I looked (also too hard to review, since as far as I am aware, they're only presented during new user sign-up).
I'll deal with that at work today.
P.S. Still the wrong list, folks. Most of the people you need to convince to get changes made to pip, PyPI and the packaging ecosystem in general aren't here.