"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:
So where do we go from here? Is anyone willing to modify MWH's patch to implement the "as" syntax, resulting in a PEP with associated implementation which can be submitted for approval? Should the PEP be changed to propose a syntax that matches the existing patch?
If Guido is in faviour of the 'as' variant, I can do it. There's more to it than that, though, as PEP 306 explains. Bob Ippolito said he would help with what remains. Cheers, mwh -- Very clever implementation techniques are required to implement this insanity correctly and usefully, not to mention that code written with this feature used and abused east and west is exceptionally exciting to debug. -- Erik Naggum on Algol-style "call-by-name"