Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Arnaud Delobelle <email@example.com mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Does this mean that somehow "await x" guarantees that the coroutine will suspend at least once?
No. First, it's possible for x to finish without yielding. But even if x yields, there is no guarantee that the scheduler will run something else -- it might just resume the same task, even if there is another one that could run. It's up to the scheduler whether it implements any kind of "fair" scheduling policy.