On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:17:00PM +0300, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> wrote:
On 15.09.15 04:21, barry.warsaw wrote:
https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/e275c4cd4b44 changeset: 6059:e275c4cd4b44 user: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> date: Mon Sep 14 21:21:40 2015 -0400 summary: Move 13 -> 103
files: pep-0103.rst | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pep-0013.rst b/pep-0103.rst rename from pep-0013.rst rename to pep-0103.rst
Is it due to superstition?
It's because I suggested the PEP doesn't deserve to be listed among the top Process PEPs. Mine PEP is just Informational, so a number like 103 seems to suits it better. Barry agreed. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ phd@phdru.name Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.