I am -1 for leaving email due to the long history of standardization, for a platform whose future I don't know about.

When you say core development is busier, does that mean the experiment with python-dev failed? aka wasn't a success, if so why are we moving python-dev too if it's not working well? I stand to be corrected obviously.

On Fri., Jul. 15, 2022, 2:22 p.m. Petr Viktorin, <encukou@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Currently development discussions are split between multiple
communication channels, for example:
- python-dev and discuss.python.org for design discussions,
- GitHub Issues and Pull Requests for specific changes,
- IRC, Discord and private chats for real-time discussions,
- Topic-specific channels like typing-sig.

While most of these serve different needs, there is too much overlap
between python-dev and discuss.python.org. It seems that for most
people, this situation is worse than sticking to either one platform –
even if we don't go with that person's favorite.

The discuss.python.org experiment has been going on for quite a while,
and while the platform is not without its issues, we consider it a
success. The Core Development category is busier than python-dev.
According to staff, discuss.python.org is much easier to moderate.. If
you're following python-dev but not discuss.python.org, you're missing out.

The Steering Council would like to switch from python-dev to
discuss.python.org.
Practically, this means:
- Moving the required PEP announcements to discuss.python.org
- Moving discuss.python.org up in the devguide communications page
(https://devguide.python.org/communication/)
- And that's it?

I imagine that the mailing list will stay around for continuing past
discussion threads and for announcements, eventually switching to
auto-reject incoming messages with a pointer to discuss.python.org.

To be clear, discuss.python.org allows editing posts, which is frankly
handy for typos and clarifications. Editing alone should not be used for
adding new info -- we should cultivate a culture of being friendly to
mail users & notification watchers. This probably bears repeating in a
few places.

We're aware not everyone wants to use the discuss.python.org website,
but there are some ways to avoid it:

- For new PEPs, you can point your RSS client to
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/peps.rss – it's not e-mail, but many
email clients have RSS support. You can also watch the Steering Council
issues on GitHub (https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/)
for important questions and discussions.

- You can use discuss.python.org's “mailing list mode” (which subscribes
you to all new posts), possibly with filtering and/or categorizing
messages locally.

However, we would like to know if this will pose an undue burden to
anyone, if there are workflows or usage problems that we are not aware
of. As mentioned, this is something the Steering Council thinks is a
good idea, but we want to make sure we're aware of all the impact when
we make the final decision.



– Petr, on behalf of the Steering Council
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VHFLDK43DSSLHACT67X4QA3UZU73WYYJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/