Le samedi 3 septembre 2016, Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, at 19:44, Ethan Furman wrote:
The problem with only having `bchr` is that it doesn't help with `bytearray`;
What is the use case for bytearray.fromord? Even in the rare case someone needs it, why not bytearray(bchr(...))?
On 3 September 2016 at 08:47, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this was my point: I don't think that we need a bytearray method to create a mutable string from a single byte.
I agree with the above. Having an easy way to turn an int into a bytes object is good. But I think the built-in bchr() function on its own is enough. Just like we have bytes object literals, but the closest we have for a bytearray literal is bytearray(b". . .").