Dec. 8, 2006
6:09 a.m.
Talin wrote:
The original proposal was to make m[n] a synonym for m.group(n). "group()" is clearly map-like in its behavior.
so have you checked what exception m.group(n) raises when you try to access a group that doesn't exist ? frankly, speaking as the original SRE author, I will now flip the bikeshed bit on all contributors to this thread, and consider it closed. I'll post a patch shortly. </F>