data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
ISAAC J SCHWABACHER schrieb am 11.08.2015 um 01:05:
I don't know about you, but I sure like this better than what you have:
code.putlines(f""" static char {entry.doc_cname}[] = "{ split_string_literal(escape_bytestring(docstr))}";
{ # nested! f""" #if CYTHON_COMPILING_IN_CPYTHON struct wrapperbase {entry.wrapperbase_cname}; #endif """ if entry.is_special else ''}
{(lambda temp, argn: # my kingdom for a let! f""" for ({temp}=0; {temp}<PyTuple_GET_SIZE({argn}); {temp}++) {{ PyObject *item = PyTuple_GET_ITEM({argn}, {temp}); }}""")(..., Naming.args_cname)}
{self.starstar_arg.entry.cname} = ({Naming.kwds_cname}) ? PyDict_Copy({Naming.kwds_cname}) : PyDict_New();
if (unlikely(!{self.starstar_arg.entry.cname})) return {self.error_value()}; """)
Matter of taste, I guess. Looks awful to me. It's very difficult to visually separate input and output in this code, so it requires a thorough look to see what data is being used for the formatting. Syntax highlighting and in-string expression completion should eventually help, once IDEs support it. But then editing this code will require an editor that has such support. And not everyone is going to be willing to get one. Stefan