On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 01:33:49AM +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I don't like documentation inside PEPs. Documentation should live inside the documentation.
On Friday 11 June 2004 07:37 pm, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
Well, maybe I should have used the word "change rationale" instead of documentation. In any case, the document describes the original problem statement, potential solutions, and the process through which a solution was devised.
This is exactly the historical record PEPs were intended to provide; I think the PEP should be complete with respect to the rationale. The documentation should certainly describe the final behavior, but that shouldn't preclude a finished PEP. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation