On 5 Nov, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Oleg Broytman
wrote: On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 09:20:12PM -0500, Yury Selivanov
wrote: Big +1 from me. The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be visible
The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be visible to developers while in reality they will be visible to users -- and what the users would do with the warnings?
Complain to the authors and make them remove the issue. https://github.com/requests/requests/issues/3954 https://github.com/requests/requests/issues/3954 https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/sklearn-pandas/issues/76 https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/sklearn-pandas/issues/76 https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/5824 https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/5824 https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/472 https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/472 +1 to re-enable this from me, too. At Facebook we are running unit tests and development builds with warnings. Just be aware that for some applications that will spew a lot. Python 3.6's warnings on invalid escapes is a big source of this. - Ł