On 5 Nov, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Oleg Broytman <phd@phdru.name> wrote:

On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 09:20:12PM -0500, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
Big +1 from me.  The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be
visible

The whole point of DeprecationWarnings is to be visible to
developers while in reality they will be visible to users -- and what
the users would do with the warnings?

Complain to the authors and make them remove the issue.

https://github.com/requests/requests/issues/3954
https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/sklearn-pandas/issues/76
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/5824
https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/472


+1 to re-enable this from me, too. At Facebook we are running unit tests and development builds with warnings. Just be aware that for some applications that will spew a lot. Python 3.6's warnings on invalid escapes is a big source of this.

- Ł