This link has all post concatenated together in reverse order of how they should be read. The tags link returns the same page. Does your blog software allow you to make a master post and update with new links as available?

Ugh, either it doesn't or I couldn't find the feature (I'm using wordpress.com, if someone has advice, let me know). I can clumsily suggest scrolling from the end. Also see below about reworking this into a single multi-chapter document with coherent form.

I would if I were qualified, but I an mot. One way to get people to help with details is to publish mistakes. This happens all the time on python-list ;-). Pre-review would be nice though.

I don't mind so much the 'humiliation' of published mistakes, but since I want this to be perceived as reference grade material, I prefer pre-review. Yesterday my first mistake was found (ugh), I published an 'Errata Policy' and will stick to it from now on (see the blog itself for details of the mistake). Thankfully, I've been approached already about pre-review, we'll see how this develops (this doesn't mean other people can't also offer themselves, six eyeballs are better than four).

People have asked for an internals-doc since I started over a decade ago. A coherent CPython3.2 Internals would be nice to have with the 3.2 release next December or so, whether or not it was made 'official'.

I'm targeting py3k anyway, and while I expect a bug lull in my writing between early June and early September, I think December is a realistic date for me to have good coverage CPython 3.2's core and rework the content into a more reference-material-ish form. That said, working things into reference-material form could be significant work, so if python-dev doesn't show interest in this I think the blog posts are good enough. Other people, this is your queue to chime in and state your opinion about this appearing on python.org somewhere.

Cheers!

- Yaniv