Sept. 12, 2015
3:11 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> wrote:
then what exactly would a value landing near the "fall back" transition have given for fold? fold=1 but EDT?
As above, pytz is in its own world here. It doesn't need `fold` because it has its own hack for disambiguating local times in a fold.
But I consider it as an imperative that pytz's hack continues to work in the post-PEP 495 world. Fortunately, this is not a hard requirement to satisfy.