On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> wrote:
> then what exactly would a value landing near the
> "fall back" transition have given for fold? fold=1 but EDT?

As above, pytz is in its own world here.  It doesn't need `fold`
because it has its own hack for disambiguating local times in a fold.

But I consider it as an imperative that pytz's hack continues to work in the post-PEP 495 world.  Fortunately, this is not a hard requirement to satisfy.