On 28Apr2009 11:49, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
| Paul Moore writes:
| >
| > I've yet to hear anyone claim that they would have an actual problem
| > with a specific piece of code they have written.
|
| Yep, that's the problem. Lots of theoretical problems noone has ever encountered
| brought up against a PEP which resolves some actual problems people encounter on
| a regular basis.
|
| For the record, I'm +1 on the PEP being accepted and implemented as soon as
| possible (preferably before 3.1).
I am also +1 on this.
I would like utility functions to perform:
os-bytes->funny-encoded
funny-encoded->os-bytes
or explicit example code snippets for same in the PEP text.
--
Cameron Simpson DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
This person is currently undergoing electric shock therapy at Agnews
Developmental Center in San Jose, California. All his opinions are static,
please ignore him. Thank you, Nurse Ratched
- the sig quote of Bob "Another beer, please" Christ
