Sept. 2, 2013
8:18 a.m.
Le Sun, 1 Sep 2013 11:36:51 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> a écrit :
+1 from me for both tracemalloc and failmalloc in the same vein as faulthandler (and using similar API concepts to faulthandler).
While I like the flat top level naming structure, we should clearly document these as implementation dependent runtime services. Other implementations may not provide them at all, and even if they do, many details will likely be different.
So, it sounds like Victor may write a new PEP soon :-) +1 from me on a flat namespace. Non-designed naming hierarchies are just a pain to work with. Regards Antoine.