I can do it but I don't want to be reviewing and accepting a PEP that's still under discussion, and I don't have the bandwidth to follow the discussion here -- I can only read the PEP. I will start that now.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 06:32, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 February 2015 at 19:47, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
>> So is the PEP ready for pronouncement or should there be more discussion?
>
> I think Brett's idea is worth incorporating, so let's thrash that out first.
>
>> Also, do you have a BDFL-delegate or do you want me to review it?
>
> No-one has stepped up as BDFL-delegate, and there's no obvious
> candidate, so I think you're it, sorry :-)

If Guido isn't keen, I'd be willing to cover it as the current runpy
module maintainer and the one that updated this part of the
interpreter startup sequence to handle the switch to importlib in 3.3.

The PEP itself doesn't actually touch any of that internal machinery
though, it just makes the capability a bit more discoverable and
user-friendly.

Regards,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)