On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:56:00 -0700 Guido van Rossum email@example.com wrote:
ISTM the only reasonable thing is to have a random seed picked very early in the process, to be used to change the hash() function of str/bytes/unicode (in a way that they are still compatible with each
Do str and bytes still have to be compatible with each other in 3.x?
Hm, you're right, that's no longer a concern. (Though ATM the hashes still *are* compatible.)
Merry hashes, weakrefs and thread-local memoryviews to everyone!