24 Aug
2011
24 Aug
'11
5:16 p.m.
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 02:15 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
Antoine Pitrou writes:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:34:17 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote: Martin has long claimed that the fact that I/O is done in terms of UTF-16 means that the internal representation is UTF-16
Which I/O?
Eg, display of characters in the interpreter.
I don't know why you say it's "done in terms of UTF-16", then. Unicode strings are simply encoded to whatever character set is detected as the terminal's character set. Regards Antoine.