data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efe4b/efe4bed0c2a0c378057d3a32de1b9bcc193bea5e" alt=""
Am 27.07.2010 12:49, schrieb Steve Holden:
On 7/27/2010 11:02 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:57:22 +0200 Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
Am 27.07.2010 04:43, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 7/26/2010 5:15 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Sure PyPI is part of the ecosystem. But so are quite a lot of other tools, and none of them are tracked in bugs.python.org. (This is also the case for the website.) I'd really like bugs.python.org to remain a tracker for what we ship as the CPython distribution, and nothing else. There's enough content in there already.
How about one other tracker, say bugs.python/org/tools (or projects, or ???) for everything else: pypi, distribute2 (until part of release), web site, sandbox projects? It would have to be taught how to turn revxxxx + component into a link to the appropriate repository.
I still think that one tracker per project/site is the better way.
Only if they have similar look and feel, and don't require you to register the same login N times, though.
Is it really time to give devs a distributed identity good for a range of systems? Sounds like a potentially hairy management task.
IMO supporting OpenID is good enough. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.