5 May
2015
5 May
'15
10:37 p.m.
On 5 May 2015 at 23:25, Yury Selivanov
Note that I don't have a problem with there being no existing implementation other than asyncio. I'd just like it if we could be clear over exactly what we mean when we say "the PEP is not tied to asyncio".
Well, "the PEP is not tied to asyncio" -- this is correct. *The new syntax and new protocols know nothing about asyncio*.
asyncio will know about the PEP by implementing new protocols where required etc (but supporting these new features isn't in the scope of the PEP).
Thanks. That's something that may be worth explicitly noting in the PEP (I don't recall it from when I last looked but that was a while ago). Paul