On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I
could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed,
and/or not the same as "default".

Can we just get rid of "trunk" altogether?  It's history is a strict subset of the 2.7 branch's history, isn't it?

Daniel Stutzbach