[Python-Dev] Re: Should the definition of an "(async) iterator" include __iter__?

Guido van Rossum wrote:

TBH I don't think there is an *actual* problem here. I think it's just about choosing the right wording for the glossary (which IMO does not have status as a source of truth anyway).

Good point. I'm probably approaching this from the wrong angle (by trying to "fix" the language, rather than the docs).