The only possible problem I can see with folding linenumbers is if someone sets a breakpoint on such a line. And I think it'll be difficult to explain the missing line numbers to pdb, so there isn't an easy workaround (at least, it takes more than my 30 seconds of brainpoewr to come up with one:-). -- Jack Jansen | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++ Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++ www.oratrix.nl/~jack | see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm
Jack Jansen wrote:
The only possible problem I can see with folding linenumbers is if someone sets a breakpoint on such a line. And I think it'll be difficult to explain the missing line numbers to pdb, so there isn't an easy workaround (at least, it takes more than my 30 seconds of brainpoewr to come up with one:-).
Eek! We can set a breakpoint on a doc string? :-) There's no code in there. It should be treated as a comment by pdb. I can't set a breakpoint on a comment line even in C ;-) There must be something deeper about it... -- Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
participants (2)
-
Jack Jansen -
Vladimir Marangozov