Re: [Python-Dev] Re: webbrowser.py
| > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
| > > Edit libwebbrowser.tex as you see fit, then send it to me
| > > and I'll TeXify it back to you. <wink>
| >
| > Uploaded to http://python.org/sf/754022 . I am not a native English
| > speaker, and this is the first time I've edited a TeX file. Please
| > correct my grammar, spelling, TeX, whatever...
Outstanding work Oleg. I read it through and wouldn't change a bit.
I have revised: libwebbrowser.tex.patch and webbrowser.py.patch.
They are Ok regarding grammar, TeX and ... whatever <wink>.
I recommend to apply both files.
However, I would withdraw the third file -- webbrowser wrapper script, since the same
functionality can be accomplished with:
python -m webbrowser http://www.python.org
best regards,
Senra
--
,_
| ) Rodrigo Senra
Hello! On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:31:29PM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
Outstanding work Oleg. I read it through and wouldn't change a bit. I have revised: libwebbrowser.tex.patch and webbrowser.py.patch. They are Ok regarding grammar, TeX and ... whatever <wink>. I recommend to apply both files.
Thank you very much!
However, I would withdraw the third file -- webbrowser wrapper script, since the same functionality can be accomplished with:
python -m webbrowser http://www.python.org
Oh, that's an idea! I haven't thought about it because I didn't switched to python 2.4 yet - commercial programs that I'm developing are based on 2.3. I copied the "webbrowser script" idea from pydoc/pydoc.py. Fred, now it's your turn. Please review http://python.org/sf/754022 and decide what to do with all that. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Hello! Jim Jewett have sent me information about remote features of Opera, so I downloaded Opera for Linux and w32 and tested them. On Linux Opera support remote functionality almost identical to Mozilla. I added a new Opera controller. On w32 remote commands are ignored, so GenericBrowser still is used. The updated patches were uploaded to http://python.org/sf/754022 . This, I hope, is the last touch. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
| > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote: | > > Edit libwebbrowser.tex as you see fit, then send it to me | > > and I'll TeXify it back to you. <wink> | > | > Uploaded to http://python.org/sf/754022 . I am not a native English | > speaker, and this is the first time I've edited a TeX file. Please | > correct my grammar, spelling, TeX, whatever...
Outstanding work Oleg. I read it through and wouldn't change a bit. I have revised: libwebbrowser.tex.patch and webbrowser.py.patch. They are Ok regarding grammar, TeX and ... whatever <wink>. I recommend to apply both files.
FWIW, same judgement from me. Reinhold -- Mail address is perfectly valid!
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:46:09PM +0200, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
Outstanding work Oleg. I read it through and wouldn't change a bit. I have revised: libwebbrowser.tex.patch and webbrowser.py.patch. They are Ok regarding grammar, TeX and ... whatever <wink>. I recommend to apply both files.
FWIW, same judgement from me.
Thank you! Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
participants (3)
-
Oleg Broytmann -
Reinhold Birkenfeld -
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra