Barry, email package in Python CVS significantly differs from the mimelib version. Shoould I wait while you update it or should I recreate my patches against Python CVS version? Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
"OB" == Oleg Broytmann <phd@phd.pp.ru> writes:
OB> email package in Python CVS significantly differs from the OB> mimelib version. Shoould I wait while you update it or should OB> I recreate my patches against Python CVS version? I'm not planning on updating the mimelib version any time soon. What I might do is create a branch in the Python cvs so that I can backport it to Python 2.1. Or maybe I should just backport what's in the cvs right now (it's not much -- there are a couple of generators there that need to be rewritten). A patch against Python CVS would be best. -Barry
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:42:48AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
A patch against Python CVS would be best.
Ok, I see. Will try to recreate patches and tests. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:42:48AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
A patch against Python CVS would be best.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=549133&group_id=5470&atid=305470 Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
participants (2)
-
barry@zope.com
-
Oleg Broytmann