2.7 and 3.2 release schedules
After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases is not as big of an issue as I once thought. Therefore, I'd like to adopt the schedule I posted a few weeks back for 2.7 only. This only means some other lucky victi... I mean volunteer can do 3.2. :) -- Regards, Benjamin
Benjamin Peterson schrieb:
After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases is not as big of an issue as I once thought. Therefore, I'd like to adopt the schedule I posted a few weeks back for 2.7 only.
This only means some other lucky victi... I mean volunteer can do 3.2. :)
If no one else wants to try and ruin Python 3, I'll do it <wink>. In the regular 18-month schedule, it is due around Jan 2011, when I will have finished my diploma and have enough time while looking for PhD opportunities. cheers, Georg
On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Benjamin Peterson schrieb:
After more thought, I think that separating the 2.7 and 3.2 releases is not as big of an issue as I once thought. Therefore, I'd like to adopt the schedule I posted a few weeks back for 2.7 only.
This only means some other lucky victi... I mean volunteer can do 3.2. :)
If no one else wants to try and ruin Python 3, I'll do it <wink>.
Ha ha ha^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGreat! Benjamin's the expert now, but I'm here to help if needed. -Barry
Barry Warsaw <barry <at> python.org> writes:
If no one else wants to try and ruin Python 3, I'll do it <wink>.
Ha ha ha^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGreat! Benjamin's the expert now, but I'm here to help if needed.
Well Georg isn't a novice when it comes to ruining things, especially documentation and commit statistics. Although I'm sure guidance from a veteran can be useful if we want to reach that ultimate degree of perfection which helps attract an endless stream of anonymous function syntax proposals. Regards Antoine, who is improving as well.
participants (4)
-
Antoine Pitrou -
Barry Warsaw -
Benjamin Peterson -
Georg Brandl