logging package vs unicode
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c90e/2c90e732051b05fc3910b63a3704428b09b85acd" alt=""
Hi All, The documentation for the logging package doesn't include any mention of unicode. What's the recommended usage in terms of passing unicode vs encoded strings? How does this differ from Python 2 to Python 3? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/995d7/995d70416bcfda8f101cf55b916416a856d884b1" alt=""
FWIW, I think the best way to avoid UnicodeError is: Don't use chars out of ASCII in Python2. I prefer '%r' to '%s' because it escapes chars not printable or out of ASCII with backslash. On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
-- INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/995d7/995d70416bcfda8f101cf55b916416a856d884b1" alt=""
FWIW, I think the best way to avoid UnicodeError is: Don't use chars out of ASCII in Python2. I prefer '%r' to '%s' because it escapes chars not printable or out of ASCII with backslash. On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
-- INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>
participants (2)
-
Chris Withers
-
INADA Naoki