Has anyone had a chance to test that 2.1.2 builds and works correctly on anything? I'm testing on the following systems. sourceforge compile farm boxes are marked as such, compaq testdrive boxes to arrive as well[1]. For each, a fresh cvs export, followed by ./configure ; make ; make test. Are there additional useful tests that could be run? Linux/x86 Redhat 6.2 PASSED Linux/x86 Redhat 7.1 PASSED Linux/x86 Redhat 7.2 PASSED Solaris/sparc 2.7 (gcc-2.95.2) PASSED Linux/x86 Debian 2.2 (cf.sf.net) PASSED Linux/PPC [RS/6000] Debian 2.2 (cf.sf.net) PASSED Linux/alpha Debian 2.2 (cf.sf.net) PASSED FreeBSD 4.4 (cf.sf.net) PASSED Solaris/sparc 2.8 (cf.sf.net) (gcc-2.95.2) PASSED Tru64/Alpha 4.0 (compaq) ... still building ... Tru64/Alpha 5.1 (compaq) ... to be done ... Linux/sparc Debian 2.2 (cf.sf.net) FAILED This is scary. I don't know why this one alone fails - it fails the test_math test. Running the test by hand: anthonybaxter@usf-cf-sparc-linux-1:~/python212_linxsparc$ PYTHONPATH= ./python ./Lib/test/test_math.py math module, testing with eps 1e-05 constants acos Traceback (most recent call last): File "./Lib/test/test_math.py", line 21, in ? testit('acos(-1)', math.acos(-1), math.pi) OverflowError: math range error Running math.acos(-1) gives the correct answer. Anyone got any idea? I couldn't get py212 to build on our remaining solaris/x86 box, but then I can't get 2.1.1 to build on it either, without a whole lot of manual hackery - so I don't care about that. It's just a stuffed machine. :) I was hoping to test on MacOS X, but the cf.sf.net boxes aren't answering... anyone else want to give it a go? Anthony [1] sheesh. had to install telnet for the compaq boxes. first time I've not had ssh access somewhere for a while. . . (plus, they don't have cvs. sigh.)
participants (7)
-
Anthony Baxter
-
barry@zope.com
-
Guido van Rossum
-
Martin v. Loewis
-
Sjoerd Mullender
-
Skip Montanaro
-
Tim Peters