On Wed, 31 May 2000, Ka-Ping Yee wrote:

Hey, i admit it's a bit primitive, but it seems significantly better than nothing. The software people at ILM have coped with it fairly well for a year, and for the most part we like it.

I'm not sure about the requirements - particularly, submissions and correspondence about bugs via email, which my zope "tracker" doesn't do - but the tracker may be worth looking at, also:

http://www.zope.org/Members/klm/SoftwareCarpentry

(See the prototype tracker, mentioned there, or my "tracker tracker" at http://www.zope.org/Members/klm/Tracker , for flagrant, embarrassing exposure of the outstanding tracker complaints...)

(I haven't had the time to take care of the tracker as i would like, or to look at how tracker and roundup could inform eachother - but i haven't even gotten as far as examining that. I get the feeling they take fairly different approaches - which could mean neat synergy, or total disconnection. Ping, any thoughts?)

Ken klm@digicool.com