On 16 Sep 2015 18:48, "Paul Moore" <p.f.moore@gmail.com> wrote:

On 16 September 2015 at 06:10, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>

wrote:

...

The only thing that hg really lost badly on IMO was "named branches", and that's been fixed with bookmarks.

FWIW, I still find bookmarks confusing to use compared to git branches. I don't know whether that's because bitbucket doesn't support them well,

It's BitBucket - their PR system for Mercurial primarily relies on named branches rather than bookmarks. Gory details: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/6705/cant-create-pull-request-from-... Regards, Nick.