Oks. Thank you very much. --- *Daniel García (cr0hn)* Security researcher and ethical hacker *Personal site*: http://cr0hn.com *Linkedin*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garciagarciadaniel *Company*: http://abirtone.com *Twitter*: @ggdaniel https://twitter.com/ggdaniel El día 18 de abril de 2016 a las 18:40:14, Guido van Rossum ( guido@python.org) escrito:

A better place for this question would be the tulip Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-tulip

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:05 AM, cr0hn wrote:

...

Hi all,

It's the first time I write in this list. Sorry if it's not the best place for this question.

After I read the Asyncio's documentation, PEPs, Guido/Jesse/David Beazley articles/talks, etc, I developed a PoC library that mixes: Process + Threads + Asyncio Tasks, doing an scheme like this diagram:

main -> Process 1 -> Thread 1.1 -> Task 1.1.1 -> Task 1.1.2 -> Task 1.1.3

-> Thread 1.2 -> Task 1.2.1 -> Task 1.2.2 -> Task 1.2.3

Process 2 -> Thread 2.1 -> Task 2.1.1 -> Task 2.1.2 -> Task 2.1.3

-> Thread 2.2 -> Task 2.2.1 -> Task 2.2.2 -> Task 2.2.3

In my local tests, this approach appear to improve (and simplify) the concurrency/parallelism for some tasks but, before release the library at github, I don't know if my aproach is wrong and I would appreciate your opinion.

Thank you very much for your time.

Regards!

-- Daniel García a.k.a. cr0hn - Security researcher and pentester @ggdaniel http://www.cr0hn.com/me/

_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)