Re: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 397 - Python launcher for Windows
On 19 February 2012 03:09, Mark Hammond <mhammond@skippinet.com.au> wrote:
Thanks for the note Paul, but did you also mean to CC python-dev?
Yes, I did, sorry.
On 18/02/2012 9:15 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 18 February 2012 05:24, Mark Hammond<skippy.hammond@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm wondering what thoughts are on PEP 397, the Python launcher for Windows. I've been using the implementation for a number of months now and I find it incredibly useful.
I use it all the time. It's extremely useful, and I wouldn't be without it.
[OT: One interesting property I find useful - if you put an alias "vpython=python.exe" in the ini file (no path to Python) then #!vpython picks up whatever Python is on PATH - this can be very useful if you use virtualenvs a lot and want to run a script with the current virtualenv]
Thoughts or comments?
IIRC, one question was how to manage multiple installs - if I install Python 3.3 and 3.4, both of which install py.exe, and then uninstall one, what happens to py.exe. What if I then uninstall the second? Reference count the launcher?
If it were possible to package up the launcher installer with the Python installer, but then install it as a separate item, that might be best (it's what MS products seem to do a lot - install one, get ten extra - I don't like the way MS do it, but it seems appropriate here). This would also allow python.org to host a standalone version of the installer which could be installed seamlessly for older versions.
Paul
participants (1)
-
Paul Moore