Missing checkin emails
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html, it looks like r63887-r63898 are missing from the archive, too. We should probably make an effort to review those checkins. Eric.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html , it looks like r63887-r63898 are missing from the archive, too.
We should probably make an effort to review those checkins.
mail.python.org had problems yesterday, so if the mail client doesn't resend, it's very possible that messages got lost. Everything is back to normal now. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSEUsKnEjvBPtnXfVAQKPbwP+MQGUbxyydoa0OAwMM58mS1IhzLubwCpy IUd5AQulh4FPRLn04CdOQQzYlmOJg9gtkQUIlQx4iiap75H4QqM91ubSdEnzPrPH vUXIXvnujKLwEZ4PN08ZQJffp7o5w8ARLso9U0ttYAtlXjx4QYEmxpyKVVe/V/dB zemVnvW4qfE= =eojc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Barry Warsaw wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html, it looks like r63887-r63898 are missing from the archive, too.
We should probably make an effort to review those checkins.
mail.python.org had problems yesterday, so if the mail client doesn't resend, it's very possible that messages got lost. Everything is back to normal now.
Thanks, Barry. Does anyone know if we can force svn to resend the checkin notifications for that range? It also looks like r63862 and r63915 are missing. I haven't done an exhaustive analysis of what is and isn't present (I also don't know if it's normal for revisions to be missing). Eric.
Does anyone know if we can force svn to resend the checkin notifications for that range? It also looks like r63862 and r63915 are missing. I haven't done an exhaustive analysis of what is and isn't present (I also don't know if it's normal for revisions to be missing).
I just resent the range that you indicated (r63887-r63898, inclusive). Regards, Martin
participants (3)
-
"Martin v. Löwis" -
Barry Warsaw -
Eric Smith