Unless I hear any objections, I plan to adjust the current PEP statuses as follows some time this weekend: Move from Accepted to Finished: 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon 3135 New Super Spealman, Delaney, Ryan Move from Accepted to Withdrawn (with a reference to Reid Kleckner's blog post) 3146 Merging Unladen Swallow into CPython Winter, Yasskin, Kleckner The PEP 3118 enhanced buffer protocol has some ongoing semantic and implementation issues still to be worked out, so I plan to leave that at Accepted. Ditto for PEP 3121 (extension module finalisation), since that doesn't play nicely with the current 'set everything to None' approach to breaking cycles during module finalisation. The other Accepted PEPs are either packaging standards related or genuinely not implemented yet. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 19:42, Nick Coghlan
Unless I hear any objections, I plan to adjust the current PEP statuses as follows some time this weekend:
Move from Accepted to Finished:
389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon
<sigh> I had always hoped to get profile/cProfile taken care of, but obviously that just didn't ever happen. So no objection, just a slight sting from the reminder of why the PEP was left open. -Brett
3135 New Super Spealman, Delaney, Ryan
Move from Accepted to Withdrawn (with a reference to Reid Kleckner's blog post) 3146 Merging Unladen Swallow into CPython Winter, Yasskin, Kleckner
The PEP 3118 enhanced buffer protocol has some ongoing semantic and implementation issues still to be worked out, so I plan to leave that at Accepted. Ditto for PEP 3121 (extension module finalisation), since that doesn't play nicely with the current 'set everything to None' approach to breaking cycles during module finalisation.
The other Accepted PEPs are either packaging standards related or genuinely not implemented yet.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Brett Cannon
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 19:42, Nick Coghlan
wrote: Unless I hear any objections, I plan to adjust the current PEP statuses as follows some time this weekend:
Move from Accepted to Finished:
389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon
<sigh> I had always hoped to get profile/cProfile taken care of, but obviously that just didn't ever happen. So no objection, just a slight sting from the reminder of why the PEP was left open.
After starting to write a justification for marking the PEP as Final despite the outstanding TODO items, I realised that didn't make a lot of sense, so I left it at Accepted instead. So your call if you want to say "not gonna happen" and close it out anyway. I made the other 4 changes though (argparse, logging.dictConfig, new super -> Final, Unladen Swallow -> Withdrawn). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
participants (2)
-
Brett Cannon
-
Nick Coghlan