Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org
Greetings. I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message yesterday, but no one seemed to be bothered. In any case, I'll respect your decision about this patch and will never ask for a review of this patch again. Regards, Dmitry.
http://bugs.python.org/issue22619 "Possible implementation of negative limit for traceback functions" I see that Serhiy Storchaka reviewed a patch. Victor
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov <jsbfox@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message yesterday, but no one seemed to be bothered. In any case, I'll respect your decision about this patch and will never ask for a review of this patch again.
The later patches seem to miss the Mercurial header that would allow the integrated review functionality on bugs.python.org to kick in (I presume) and thus make it much easier to review.
Thank you for pointing this out. That's what I meant when I asked to "say what's wrong with it " :-) I fixed the latest patch and uploaded it. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov <jsbfox@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message yesterday, but no one seemed to be bothered. In any case, I'll respect your decision about this patch and will never ask for a review of this patch again.
The later patches seem to miss the Mercurial header that would allow the integrated review functionality on bugs.python.org to kick in (I presume) and thus make it much easier to review.
participants (4)
-
Dmitry Kazakov -
Mason Hill
-
Stefan Ring -
Victor Stinner