RE: [Python-Dev] Re: decorators and 2.4
This works with the proof-of-concept code I posted
Apparently I clipped too much. With your proof-of-concept, one of your suggestions was using names like classmethod_follows() My intent was to say: "Whatever method does become standard -- either in C, or through adding your code to stdlib -- I want some way for a reader to know quickly that a function is being decorated." Therefore I do not want "better names" like classmethod() def foo(): pass because then various decorators will have nothing in common, except for the invisible fact that they they share a common base class. decorators(classmethod()) def foo(): pass is OK, and [classmethod()] def foo(): pass might be, because the "[]\n" or "decorators(...)" warn the reader about what is happening. -jJ
participants (1)
-
Jewett, Jim J