Re: [Python-Dev] r83869 - in python/branches/py3k: Doc/library/socket.rst Doc/whatsnew/3.2.rst Lib/ssl.py Lib/test/test_socket.py Misc/NEWS Modules/socketmodule.c
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:24:50 +0200 (CEST) antoine.pitrou <python-checkins@python.org> wrote:
Author: antoine.pitrou Date: Mon Aug 9 01:24:50 2010 New Revision: 83869
Log: Issue #8524: Add a forget() method to socket objects, so as to put the socket into the closed state without closing the underlying file descriptor.
Benjamin suggested to call this detach() instead. What do you think? Thanks Antoine.
On 8/8/10 7:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:24:50 +0200 (CEST) antoine.pitrou<python-checkins@python.org> wrote:
Author: antoine.pitrou Date: Mon Aug 9 01:24:50 2010 New Revision: 83869
Log: Issue #8524: Add a forget() method to socket objects, so as to put the socket into the closed state without closing the underlying file descriptor.
Benjamin suggested to call this detach() instead. What do you think?
detach() is the name I've seen most often for this. For example, that's what MFC uses: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7zhdchw8(VS.80).aspx -- Eric.
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:53:38 -0400 Eric Smith <eric@trueblade.com> wrote:
On 8/8/10 7:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:24:50 +0200 (CEST) antoine.pitrou<python-checkins@python.org> wrote:
Author: antoine.pitrou Date: Mon Aug 9 01:24:50 2010 New Revision: 83869
Log: Issue #8524: Add a forget() method to socket objects, so as to put the socket into the closed state without closing the underlying file descriptor.
Benjamin suggested to call this detach() instead. What do you think?
detach() is the name I've seen most often for this. For example, that's what MFC uses: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7zhdchw8(VS.80).aspx
Thanks. I've done the rename in r83908. Regards Antoine.
participants (2)
-
Antoine Pitrou -
Eric Smith