make iter() return an empty iterator?

2007/8/3, Andrew Bennetts <andrew-pythondev@puzzling.org>:
I don't really think there's much reason to make "iter()" work. As you say,
What bad thing could happen if we make iter() work? If nothing, we should ask ourselves: which is the more intuitive behaviour to expect of iter()? To raise an exception or to return an empty iterator? I'm +0 for the latter. -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/

Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@bioinformed.com> wrote:
-1 here too. iter() should have an argument just like sum() and len(). regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading -------------

On 8/3/07, Steve Holden <steve@holdenweb.com> wrote:
Amen. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@bioinformed.com> wrote:
-1 here too. iter() should have an argument just like sum() and len(). regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading -------------

On 8/3/07, Steve Holden <steve@holdenweb.com> wrote:
Amen. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
participants (4)
-
Facundo Batista
-
Guido van Rossum
-
Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@bioinformed.com>
-
Steve Holden