On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

Doug Hellmann wrote:

...

We've recently run into an issue with subprocess on Solaris, as described (by an earlier reporter) in issue #7242. The patch there solves our problem, and has been verified to work by other users as well. What's the status of the ticket? Is there anything I can do to help move it forward to be included in a patch release for 2.6?

The usual 5-for-one deal applies: review five issues, and I'll review that one (with more energy than at the moment).

I have commit access, can I just check in the patch? Doug

On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

Le Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:38:42 -0500, Doug Hellmann a écrit :

...

I have commit access, can I just check in the patch?

If you are sure of yourself, you can. But in this case see my comment on the tracker.

OK, good point. I'll see about a test or two and post an update to the ticket. Thanks, Doug

On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

Doug Hellmann wrote:

...

We've recently run into an issue with subprocess on Solaris, as described (by an earlier reporter) in issue #7242. The patch there solves our problem, and has been verified to work by other users as well. What's the status of the ticket? Is there anything I can do to help move it forward to be included in a patch release for 2.6?

The usual 5-for-one deal applies: review five issues, and I'll review that one (with more energy than at the moment).

I have commit access, can I just check in the patch? Doug

On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

Le Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:38:42 -0500, Doug Hellmann a écrit :

...

I have commit access, can I just check in the patch?

If you are sure of yourself, you can. But in this case see my comment on the tracker.

OK, good point. I'll see about a test or two and post an update to the ticket. Thanks, Doug