Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Switch back to named functions, since the Ellipsis version degenerated badly

Feb. 23, 2012
4:37 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:22 AM, nick.coghlan <python-checkins@python.org> wrote:
+If the repetition of the name seems especially annoying, then a throwaway +name like ``f`` can be used instead::
I still feel that the helper function (or class) is subordinate, and should be indented. Thinking of "in ..." as a decorator helps, but makes it seem that the helper function is the important part (which it sometimes is...) I understand that adding a colon and indent has its own problems, but ... I'm not certain this is better, and I am certain that the desire for indentation is strong enough to at least justify discussion in the PEP. -jJ
4771
Age (days ago)
4771
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jim Jewett