Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm fine with dropping the 3rd arg. But I find the argument to introduce a new spelling for 1-arg randrange() weak.
I should stress that my preference for randbelow over randrange was based purely on their proposed functionality and not on their names. I do however have a preference for a function of minimum required functionality, i.e. one that allows only a single parameter (N) to set the range 0 .. N-1.
Yes, randrange(n) does that. --Guido (mobile) On Oct 17, 2015 2:28 PM, "Brian Gladman" <brg@gladman.plus.com> wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm fine with dropping the 3rd arg. But I find the argument to introduce a new spelling for 1-arg randrange() weak.
I should stress that my preference for randbelow over randrange was based purely on their proposed functionality and not on their names.
I do however have a preference for a function of minimum required functionality, i.e. one that allows only a single parameter (N) to set the range 0 .. N-1. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
participants (2)
-
Brian Gladman -
Guido van Rossum