On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Paul Prescod wrote:
Armin Rigo wrote:
I am considering using GNU Lightning to produce code from the Psyco compiler. (...)
Core Python has no GPLed components. I would hate to have you put in a bunch of work worthy of inclusion in core Python to see it rejected on those grounds.
Good remark. Anyone else has comments about this ?
Psyco would probably not be part of the core Python, but only an extension module; but your objection is nevertheless valid.
Any alternatives ?
I am considering a more theoretical approach, based on Tunes (http://tunes.org) as mentionned in Psyco's readme file, but this would take a lot more time -- althought it might give much more impressive results.
Armin.
RIGO Armin wrote:
...
I am considering a more theoretical approach, based on Tunes (http://tunes.org) as mentionned in Psyco's readme file, but this would take a lot more time -- althought it might give much more impressive results.
If you are thinking about incorporating some ideas from Tunes that's one thing. But if you want to use their code I would ask "what code?" I have heard about Tunes for several years now and not seen any visible forward progress.
See also:
http://tunes.org/Tunes-FAQ-6.html#ss6.2
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Paul Prescod wrote:
If you are thinking about incorporating some ideas from Tunes that's one thing. But if you want to use their code I would ask "what code?" I have heard about Tunes for several years now and not seen any visible forward progress.
Yes, I know this. I am myself a (recent) member of the Tunes project, and have made Tunes' goals mine.
Armin
Good remark. Anyone else has comments about this ?
Not really, except to emphasize that inclusion of GPL'ed code in core Python is indeed a no-no.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
-
Armin Rigo -
Guido van Rossum -
Paul Prescod -
RIGO Armin